Leaders: Born or Made?

Posted on July 20th, 2010 by admin in Leadership

By Mike Myatt, Chief Strategy Officer, N2growth

Leaders: born or made?Leaders: born or made? While there is a very simple answer to this question, most people are so entrenched in their beliefs that no amount of reason or logic will alter their opinions. But that’s never stopped me before…For my part, I would actually like to make an attempt at putting this useless debate to bed once and for all. So, what’s the answer? Both – some people are born with innate qualities that predispose them to being leaders, and other people while not naturally gifted with leadership ability can acquire it. Moreover, all leaders, born or made, can improve their ability with desire, experience and effort.

If we’re to be honest with ourselves, as opposed to defending a particular position to suit our needs, we’ve all known born leaders…They are those affable individuals that posses charisma and presence combined with the ability to make good decisions that people have flocked to since an early age. They were your class presidents, team captains, club leaders, and the people who held virtually all the available leadership positions you can imagine early in life. They were those unflappable individuals that seemed to just have that “it” factor. They were the born leaders we all grew up with.

Before we move on, and as a caution to those who are natural leaders, natural ability will only take you so far. Leaders who rest on their laurels without making the effort to develop their skills will eventually be overtaken by those who view leadership as a professional skill to be developed and refined. As they old saying goes, “it’s not what you’ve been given, but what you do with it that matters.” Every person has to decide for themselves whether they’ll be an underachiever or a person who excels, and since you’ll be judged for your choice, my suggestion would be to choose wisely.

Moving on, we’ve all also known individuals who while perhaps not naturally gifted leaders, either fell into, or accepted leadership responsibility, and worked diligently to develop themselves into highly effective leaders. Leadership acumen can most certainly be taught, and it can also be ingrained in those willing to put forth the effort. You see, the only things that keep someone from becoming a sound leader are a lack of character, effort and desire. If those three qualities are present, everything else can be developed. I’ve personally witnessed the shy and introverted develop presence, the greedy become giving, the arrogant develop an authentic sense of humility, the foolish become discerning and wise, people who struggled with decision making learn solid decisioning skills, individuals who lacked domain expertise acquire it, people who were ego centric transition into servant leaders and the list could go on…

Bottom line: It is not how a leader comes by their skill that is relevant. It only matters that they possess the requisite skills for the job, and that they are willing to apply those skills for the benefit of those they lead. Remember that there is no perfect leader, no single right way to lead, and no one-size-fits-all formula for leadership. Let’s stop wasting time debating whether leaders are born or made, and focus on how to help them be better leaders regardless of how they arrived.

If you have an opinion on the born vs. made argument I welcome you to share your thoughts in the comments below…

Related Posts: 15 Traits of Great Leaders - Leadership DNA - Leadership Principles

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
 


  • http://www.deanlforbes.com/dlf/ Dean L. Forbes

    Leaders: Born or made? I agree that the answer is both. Since I also agree that either one can improve his/her ability to lead, I always say that leaders emerge. In the right situations and the right times, the right leader will emerge.

    This is a very insightful post which proves again that leadership is a choice.

    Thank you.

  • http://davidburkus.com davidburkus

    The endless debate between Great Man theorists and skills/behavior theorists has a new, genius answer: who cares as long as they are the right leader?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/mikemyatt mikemyatt

    Thanks Dean…greatly appreciate the comment

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/mikemyatt mikemyatt

    Thanks David…

  • http://card4net.com sami

    the leader must lead himself.
    Only made!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/mikemyatt mikemyatt

    While I agree a leader must lead themselves, I offer the caution that leaders only accountable to themselves are train-wrecks in the making.

    I meant this post to be more of a thinking exercise than a choosing-up sides and fighting till the bitter end drill. I tend to agree with David who noted above the somewhat ridiculous nature of the semantical argument by stating: "who cares as long as they are the right leader?"

    Thanks for sharing Sami….

  • Dan

    Leaders take others to a destination (by definition). They need to know where they want to take their people (that comes from having knowledge, goals, and/or beliefs therefore is developed). It helps to have people that like and know how to lead (like is the born part), but born leaders without knowledge, goals and belief system are leaders for leaders sake and often end up creating a lot of trouble for themselves and those they lead.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/mikemyatt mikemyatt

    We are in agreement on all points Dan. The real key is not whether or not you are naturally gifted, but rather what steps you take in developing toward your full potential. And as you so astutely pointed out, even highly developed individuals who fail to lead with commitment and passion will not likely maximize their effectiveness as a leader. Thanks for adding to the conversation Dan..

  • Oarabile

    Mike i guess it will be unrealistic to say leaders are born or made. It is my believe that we are born leaders but we don't rise to leadership as a result of that potential but out of our commitment to it. What we do to invest in our potential is what will distinguish us from the lime light to were we are supposed to be as leaders.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/mikemyatt mikemyatt

    Hi Oarabile:

    Thanks for your comment. I think the distinction you drew accurately points out the necessity of being committed to development in order to maximize potential as a leader. Thanks for adding to the discussion Oarabile…

  • http://blog.core-ed.org/greg/2010/09/leadership-thinking.html Principal (le?) learning » Leadership thinking

    [...] leaders – born or made? [...]

  • http://www.leadershipcourseware.com/blog/general/strong-leaders-manage-successful-managers-lead/ Leadership Courseware Blog » Strong Leaders Manage, Successful Managers Lead

    [...] born with certain personality traits that allow them to be more comfortable in leadership roles. (See Mike Myatt’s post.) Without guidance, training and experience, however, native traits will not evolve in such a way as [...]

  • Vince Lopez

    We are leaders in our own world, in our own friends and small social network. But in a larger organization, one has to acquire the necessary skills so as to become effective leaders.

blog comments powered by Disqus