<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thought Leaders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/</link>
	<description>Where CEOs Come to Grow &#38; where Leadership Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith Fuqua-Purvis</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28838</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith Fuqua-Purvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28838</guid>
		<description>To me a Thought Leader provokes your thinking.  They challenging your assumptions your way of approaching things.  Within some organizations they are shunned as they do not willingly &quot;walk the line&quot; and social norming elements come into play. 
 
To me Thought Leaders can be bringing completely new content or simply a new view on existing content/ideas.  It&#039;s more about the organization and provication.  I also agree that they aren&#039;t necessarily recognized at the time.  They can be, but sometimes it&#039;s only recognized through reflection and consideration of the long-term impact that the individual had on the choices you make and the direction your life takes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me a Thought Leader provokes your thinking.  They challenging your assumptions your way of approaching things.  Within some organizations they are shunned as they do not willingly &quot;walk the line&quot; and social norming elements come into play. </p>
<p>To me Thought Leaders can be bringing completely new content or simply a new view on existing content/ideas.  It&#039;s more about the organization and provication.  I also agree that they aren&#039;t necessarily recognized at the time.  They can be, but sometimes it&#039;s only recognized through reflection and consideration of the long-term impact that the individual had on the choices you make and the direction your life takes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith Fuqua-Purvis</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28837</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith Fuqua-Purvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28837</guid>
		<description>Mike - Thanks for the interesting post and discussion. 
 
I agree with much of what Dan Collins says.  To me, Thought Leaders are necessarily the one&#039;s up on the stage, with the big PR and Marketing.  Some of them are - others are simply public figures or industry leaders, both with are not the same as Thought Leaders.   
 
I&#039;ve given myself a task as I review all my WBF notes and craft future blogs to assess who I percieve as true Thought Leaders.  My personal perspective is that I would not call most of the individuals we saw speak Thought Leaders.  They were Leaders and Representatives along multiple dimensions, but not necesssarily Thought Leaders. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; Thanks for the interesting post and discussion. </p>
<p>I agree with much of what Dan Collins says.  To me, Thought Leaders are necessarily the one&#039;s up on the stage, with the big PR and Marketing.  Some of them are &#8211; others are simply public figures or industry leaders, both with are not the same as Thought Leaders.   </p>
<p>I&#039;ve given myself a task as I review all my WBF notes and craft future blogs to assess who I percieve as true Thought Leaders.  My personal perspective is that I would not call most of the individuals we saw speak Thought Leaders.  They were Leaders and Representatives along multiple dimensions, but not necesssarily Thought Leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28830</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 02:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28830</guid>
		<description>Thought Leaders...you know them when you hear them!   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought Leaders&#8230;you know them when you hear them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynne q</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28821</link>
		<dc:creator>lynne q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 03:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28821</guid>
		<description>Leaders today are our boss, they keep on telling us what to do which is very wrong. Leaders doesn&#039;t demand respect, but rather, commands it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaders today are our boss, they keep on telling us what to do which is very wrong. Leaders doesn&#039;t demand respect, but rather, commands it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikemyatt</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28796</link>
		<dc:creator>mikemyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28796</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Gina...I particularly like the concept of not being afraid of the challenge nor of failure. Thanks again for stopping by Gina... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Gina&#8230;I particularly like the concept of not being afraid of the challenge nor of failure. Thanks again for stopping by Gina&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28793</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28793</guid>
		<description>They truly are those that are doing &amp; creating in ways no one has before. They think in ways no one else does. They are not afraid of a challenge or of failure. They are always looking at ways to change what is considered the &quot;way things are done&quot;.  They are so inspiring to watch in action- to try to catch a glimpse of how their brain works. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They truly are those that are doing &amp; creating in ways no one has before. They think in ways no one else does. They are not afraid of a challenge or of failure. They are always looking at ways to change what is considered the &quot;way things are done&quot;.  They are so inspiring to watch in action- to try to catch a glimpse of how their brain works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikemyatt</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28785</link>
		<dc:creator>mikemyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 01:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28785</guid>
		<description>Hi John: 
 
Thanks for the comment. Your observation about some thought leaders revisiting old subjects with a fresh perspective is a good one, and Malcolm Gladwell is a great example of this. Thanks for sharing John. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John: </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. Your observation about some thought leaders revisiting old subjects with a fresh perspective is a good one, and Malcolm Gladwell is a great example of this. Thanks for sharing John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Childs</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28782</link>
		<dc:creator>John Childs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28782</guid>
		<description>Mike, 
 
I always thought thought leaders, simply put, were those with fresh new ideas on old topics.  One I like in particular is Malcom Gladwell.  His writing is interesting, provocative, and different.  He, in my book, is a prime example of a thought leader because of his ability to relook at subjects and give us fresh insight into things we may have never thought of before. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, </p>
<p>I always thought thought leaders, simply put, were those with fresh new ideas on old topics.  One I like in particular is Malcom Gladwell.  His writing is interesting, provocative, and different.  He, in my book, is a prime example of a thought leader because of his ability to relook at subjects and give us fresh insight into things we may have never thought of before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikemyatt</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28780</link>
		<dc:creator>mikemyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28780</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan - I understand your point, but I prefer to view the  historical figures you mention as examples of those who attain positions of leadership without being leaders. Tyrants, dictators sycophants, and others of that ilk don&#039;t lead they simply wield power - there is a difference. Maybe splitting hairs, because my suspicion is that we&#039;re probably closer together than we are apart. Thanks Dan. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan &#8211; I understand your point, but I prefer to view the  historical figures you mention as examples of those who attain positions of leadership without being leaders. Tyrants, dictators sycophants, and others of that ilk don&#039;t lead they simply wield power &#8211; there is a difference. Maybe splitting hairs, because my suspicion is that we&#039;re probably closer together than we are apart. Thanks Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.n2growth.com/blog/the-key-to-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-28779</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n2growth.com/blog/?p=673#comment-28779</guid>
		<description>Mike, 
 
Unfortunately even &quot;wrong&quot; thought leadership is thought leadership.  Think of all the examples of those who have led humanity down morally reprehensible paths or led us &quot;astray&quot;. They were certainly thought leaders.  You are right - it certainly is all about meaningful impact but the right and wrong part of the equation doesn&#039;t alter the leadership quotient. 
Movement to Action is the measurement - Hype is the fuel - Quality of content,in a moral sense, is up to each one of us to determine. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, </p>
<p>Unfortunately even &quot;wrong&quot; thought leadership is thought leadership.  Think of all the examples of those who have led humanity down morally reprehensible paths or led us &quot;astray&quot;. They were certainly thought leaders.  You are right &#8211; it certainly is all about meaningful impact but the right and wrong part of the equation doesn&#039;t alter the leadership quotient.<br />
Movement to Action is the measurement &#8211; Hype is the fuel &#8211; Quality of content,in a moral sense, is up to each one of us to determine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

