viagra online | cialis online
 

Say No to Bad Meetings

Posted on May 12th, 2010 by admin in Operations & Strategy, Productivity

By Mike Myatt, Chief Strategy Officer, N2growth

Meeting OverloadIf you’ve ever watched an episode of NBC’s “The Office” you know exactly what an unproductive meeting looks like. So my question is this: Why are so many meetings a total waste of time? Meetings for the sake of meetings are a huge pet-peeve of mine. Over the years I’ve found that you can tell quite a bit about a person by how many meetings they call or attend. I have found the most productive people call very few meetings, and rarely attend meetings they don’t call. Whether meetings are held at the board, executive, management or staff levels, or whether they are small project related meetings or large company-wide meetings, the same basic principles apply to making meetings effective. In today’s post I’ll provide you with some basic do’s & don’ts that will help you get more out of your meetings.

Early in my career I worked for a company where the CEO loved to have meetings. Meetings were held ad-nauseum about virtually every topic under the sun. Regrettably these meetings rarely resulted in anything being accomplished, and in fact, because the meetings were poorly conceived and poorly facilitated, it turned out that most meetings just ended-up being rehashing sessions for the subjects not resolved in prior meetings. Non productive meetings not only serve little purpose, but they waste one of the most precious resources that a company has…time. One of the biggest mistakes a corporation can make is to take its top talent away from productive activities and sequester them away for a mind-numbing babble session. Bad meetings are not only a productivity drain, but they also can cause a decline in morale and a lack of confidence in leadership.

The reality is that there is no excuse for holding a non-productive meeting. I won’t attend a meeting unless it is a good use of my time.  You won’t see my smiling face in attendance at a meeting unless I know why the meeting is being called, who’s going to be in attendance, what the objectives (preferably hard deliverables) are for the meeting, and unless an agenda has been circulated in advance of the meeting allowing for proper preparation. Following is a more detailed breakdown of Myatt’s 10 rules for productive meetings:

  1. Culture: You need to create a culture where meetings are valued as a highest and best use activity and not a nuisance. If leadership doesn’t value meetings then it will be impossible for the rest of the company to do so. At my firm an employee’s contribution (or lack thereof) to meetings is part of their formal performance review. People know that their contribution to meetings will not only have an impact on the company, but on their paycheck as well. Meetings also need to be fun…I’m not talking about silly themes or ice-breaking games, but rather having a relaxed, non-intimidating, and professional atmosphere surrounding your meetings. If people know that they are valued, respected and won’t be publicly embarrassed they will in turn be at ease and prepared to deliver.  
  2. Calendaring: Meetings need to have a start time and an end-time. If you can’t accomplish the stated objectives within the time allotted then schedule a follow-up meeting to deal with unresolved items. Don’t ask me to attend a meeting and then not start on time. In my firm there is a standing monetary fine imposed in 5 minute increments for tardiness…While this may sound harsh, I can tell you that it is extremely effective in that rarely does anyone not show-up on time. Also, try not to hold meetings during prime-time…I prefer meetings early in the morning, over lunch or at the end of the day. Don’t take your team out of production during the meat of the day, rather take those times of the day that are typically the least productive times and hold your meetings then.
  3. Agenda: I’m not a big fan of impromptu meetings. Creativity and innovation are stimulated by structure, not stifled by it. If the subject is worth addressing, it is worth planning for and preparation takes time. A detailed agenda for a meeting should be circulated in advance to all attendees so that they have time to prepare to make a valuable contribution.
  4. Attendees: Don’t invite people to a meeting that have nothing to contribute, and don’t hold a meeting unless the key contributors can be in attendance. If a key person is not able to attend the meeting, reschedule for a time when they can be in attendance. If you’re coming to a meeting not prepared to make a valuable contribution why are you coming?
  5. Leadership: Someone must be in charge of the meeting. All meetings should have a meeting chair who’s responsible for keeping the meeting on point, on schedule and achieving the meeting objectives. Bad meetings are a result of bad leadership.
  6. Focus: Blackberrys, iPhones, and other PDA’s need to be turned-off. Nothing can be accomplished when people are not giving 100% focused attention to the issue at hand. If a meeting is important enough to attend, it should demand the participants full attention.
  7. Deliverables: If the objectives for the meeting are not clearly articulated as a defined set of deliverables your meeting is not worth having. The purpose of a meeting is to accomplish something, and you can’t accomplish something if that something is vague, ambiguous, ethereal or has not been defined to begin with.
  8. Technology: Use technology to add value to your meetings. Use web conferencing to bring in contributors from other locations and to improve collaboration. Use audio or video to record your meetings so that no valuable piece of information falls through the cracks. If you can’t use audio or video, then don’t limit the value of a contributor by having them take minutes…call in an administrative person to fulfill that role. The proper use of technology can save time, increase efficiency and productivity, and cut unnecessary travel expenses.
  9. Location: Don’t fall into the trap of going off-site unless it is absolutely necessary. Off-site meetings are expensive not only in terms of the hard dollars spent on facilities, but also in terms of the commute time to and from the meeting. You should have the discipline to use your facilities in an uninterrupted fashion. Make it known that meetings are not to be interrupted unless it is an emergency (an “emergency” needs to be defined as both urgent and important).
  10. Assess and Evaluate: The meeting chair should conduct a critical post-meeting analyses to determine what went well, what went wrong, were the right people in attendance, were the people prepared, were the deliverables met, etc. The bottom line is that companies that have great meetings have great meetings for a reason…they work on it.

It’s your time, and if you choose to spend it in meetings, make sure you spend it wisely….

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responses to “Say No to Bad Meetings”

  1. Mike,
    Another great post! I'll be taking this one to heart. Like you, I have been held prisoner in many a meeting that has robbed my life of time I will never get back. I am particularly attached to the agenda leadership points. People need to know what the aim is and someone needs to control the "Good Ideas Club" that can result when the aim is missed.

    Cheers,
    Landon Creasy http://landoncreasy.wordpress.com/

  2. Hi Landon:

    Love the comment about the "Good Ideas Club." I tend to refer to those types as "unguided missiles." On the bright side, it is the type of advice proffered above that lends the structure necessary to turn unguided missiles into target locked efficient weapons. Thanks as always Landon.

Leave a Reply